Sebastian "weirdo nerd" Michaelis (
untiltheend) wrote2037-05-21 10:15 pm
IC Contact

This is Sebastian Michaelis. I am unavailable at present, but please leave a message. Should a response be needed I will reply when time permits me. Please do keep your message brief.

no subject
[Jedao - who has spent most of his life under interrogation in the guise of therapy - feels that failing to distinguish between a lack of empathy and lack of affect is a criminally clumsy mistake for someone who wants to be taken seriously as a counselor, leaving entirely aside what the standards are or should be for wardens in general. Of course, 'criminally clumsy' is itself a concept grown largely out of the insane levels of competence porn expected of anyone in faction service.]
You may be assured I consider discretion a cardinal virtue. Thank you for sharing your perspective.
no subject
I will grant that, when I asked who the most competent counselor on the Barge is, he did readily admit to not being very skilled, so at least he has a modicum of self-awareness. ...Which is rather a low bar for praise, but here we are. [Sigh. Alas!]
While it was hardly necessary on your part, [stupid wardens can do as they please, after all; it's only pretense to act as if inmates have any true say in anything] thank you for asking.
Was that all you needed me for, sir?
no subject
I do separately have a request, regarding forms of address, but I don't want to imply any sort of condition; we can discuss it at another time if you have pressing obligations.
no subject
...Please forgive me for making assumptions, but: should you wish to be addressed casually, I absolutely cannot abide by that where Wardens are concerned.
no subject
However, 'sir' feels somewhat improper to me, as you are not and have never been a soldier under my command. I wonder if it would be an acceptable compromise to refer to me as "Instructor Jedao"? As that was my most recent position and title at Shuos Academy. And somewhat more analogous to the position of warden, I feel.
Jedao-ye would be the equivalent honorific when addressing me directly, although that implies that I'm one of your instructors, not merely an instructor.
1/2
A person who understands the value of formality? Who doesn't insist that wardens and inmates are completely equal?
Give him a second.]
no subject
Since I admittedly am not familiar with your world and so would not be able to parse the finer details of proper address, I suppose it depends on how you yourself view wardenhood. While you are not my Warden, have you still a responsibility to guide me towards redemption? Or have you only that obligation to whichever Inmate is assigned to you?
no subject
I believe I have an obligation to the welfare of every inmate, but not necessarily to the education or improvement of every inmate. However, I do also consider myself somewhat invested in your redemption in specific, both because I feel there are at least some things about you that I understand well enough to have some useful guidance to offer, and due to my connection with Cho Hakkai.
Whether you have any interest in listening to my guidance is, of course, a separate matter. I would be honored if you addressed me as Jedao-ye, but not offended at its absence.
no subject
[Since apparently that's something a person can tell over one conversation over the network, MALCOLM.]
Just to clarify: "Jedao-ye" would only be appropriate in direct address?
[Not offended at its absence... Too bad, really. Sebastian likes the option of causing offense by title usage. Now, Jedao isn't as hateable as certain other wardens, but Sebastian's not sure if he wants to go so far as honouring Jedao with his preferred title.]
no subject
[Jedao says serenely.]
But I like it here. So please don't feel rushed on my account. Jedao-ye would be...not inappropriate, but definitely weird, if it wasn't direct address. The only honorific that gets used in third person is -zho, because the Hexarchs are everyone's Hexarchs.
[Theoretically.]
Instructor Jedao or Warden Jedao would make more sense for speaking about me, I think.
no subject
There is absolutely nothing encouraging about hearing someone disagree with Malcolm's verdict on him. Shut up.]
...If I may, instructor Jedao: you mentioned "certain things" on which you may have guidance to offer?
["Jedao-ye" has yet to be earned, Sebastian decides.]
no subject
Beyond the matter of the utility of formality from the inside of a hierarchy...I think a lot of people on the barge mistake compassion for ethics. Compassion is one route to seeking ethics, but it's very easy for compassion alone to go awry, if one makes emotional assumptions without knowledge. Deliberate intention, careful attention to detail, logical reasoning - these are also tools for guiding behavior that I suspect come far more naturally to you, and I don't think they should be dismissed. Intentions are wonderful, but execution counts.
Was there something you wanted guidance on at this moment?
no subject
Nothing specific, no. Mr Cho would have me attempt to care more about putting good out into the world, which is straight-forward enough in theory. [If challenging to imagine he'll ever grow to genuinely care about.]
But I am most anxious to graduate as soon as possible, hence I will admit to grasping at whatever advice I am given. [If attending therapy with five different counsellors --> manage to graduate five times as fast??]
But thank you; it is good to know of your willingness to offer advice.
no subject
Therefore, I imagine a first step toward caring about putting good into the world might be to identify what you believe it would look like, hypothetically, to perform that task well, versus poorly. Perhaps in three to five specific, concrete ways, to avoid an impossibly broad question which all the philosophers of the world have so far died before answering.
no subject
Reading the writings of human philosophers beating their heads against the same wall over and over again can be... tiring, certainly. Personally I find utilitarianism the more sensible viewpoint rather than, say, Kant's ideas. Although if the idea is for me to lean more into "kindness", consequentialism might be the preferable option.
--Your pardon. Of course I cannot know if these terms mean anything to you. [Different worlds, etc.]
no subject
How would they apply differently to the choices you in your day-to-day life now?
[If reading them going in circles is tiring, best get out of the circles and onto the road.]
no subject
[He was young and stupid and thought only with his stomach.]
Thus I have not studied them as intensely. I did, however, always find the idea of Cyrenaicism amusingly close to a demon's perspective on life.
no subject
I'll re-read some of their work. Perhaps we can discuss it in another week or two?
no subject